It which were then before.
༡
/ 203 him
43
It may be that the return of attendances called for by His Excellency, and the remarks made thereon in the memorandum were intended not to form a complaint of neglect of duty against the Justices generally,
but to invest the sittings of the 23rd May and the 2nd [38] of June with an unusual appearance; in that case it is most respectfully to state that the impression conveyed to our minds by that unusual appearance is very different from the impression made upon His Excellency. His Excellency Lees
it which were then before.
༡
/ 203 him
43
It may be that the return of attendances called for oe die Mxcellence, and the remarks made thereon in the tremorandum were intended not to form a complainé
of neglect of duty against the Justices
generalý
but to invest
the sittings of the 23d 5 Mlay aun the 2D [38] of June with an
402
by
case
unusual altcaranec; in trat
be most repectfully to state that the impression conveyed to our minds by that unusual alpearance is very different from the impression made uron His Excellency. His Excellency
Lees
:
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.